This is one hell of a Noctaventure...
My god it was awful, there was no ending to it... eternal... voting...
Composition 1 /20
Technique 4/6 :
- -
- Instrumentation 2,5/3
I thought the use of instruments here is very good. Many different styles.
- -
- Progression 1,5/3
I only felt that it lacked a structure and direction compositionally speaking.
Émotion 3,5/6 :
- -
- Naturel 2,5/3
It sounded very natural to me, especially because of the right instrumentation.
- -
- Cohérence 1/3
It didn't have good coherence, because of the different styles and pasting of melodies.
Thème 3,5/8 :
- -
- Pertinence 1/4
Rock Cinderella?? Not in my dictionary!!!
- -
- Originalité 2,5/4
Original, yes of course! Many styles. But theme wise... not really.
Composition 2 /20
What an immensely long song!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DEFINITELY HABIB!
Technique 6/6 :
- -
- Instrumentation 3/3
Nice opening! Very nice instrumentation, almost a romantic classical work. Deserves 3/3
- -
- Progression 3/3
Harmonics used here are very Essoussi Habib like with perfect mixing. My god, the progression is phenomenal!
Émotion 5/6 :
- -
- Naturel 2,5/3
It sounded very soothing. Professional.
- -
- Cohérence 2,5/3
I want to take some points away because I didn't felt really connected to the melody here.
Thème 5,5/8 :
- -
- Pertinence 3/4
I think there is a big story behind this song.
- -
- Originalité 2,5/4
Not so original really, just the classical genre.
Composition 3 /20
Technique 3,5/6 :
- -
- Instrumentation 2/3
Sounds like El Maestro music. Instrumentation is so so.
- -
- Progression 1,5/3
Progression is not really that existant, it's very short.
Émotion 4/6 :
- -
- Naturel 2/3
Sounds very good, flowing.
- -
- Cohérence 2/3
It does what it does.
Thème 2/8 :
- -
- Pertinence 0,5/4
Absolutely not in theme.
- -
- Originalité 1,5/4
Yeah, original at some point, but I don't want to give many points.
Composition 4 /20
Technique 4,5/6 :
- -
- Instrumentation 2/3
Good use of instruments.
- -
- Progression 2,5/3
Those stops are really something! Interesting. Waltzing about.
Émotion 2/6 :
- -
- Naturel 1/3
I didn't like the harmonics, really I didn't like it. It was too repetitive in the same tonality.
- -
- Cohérence 1/3
The coherence suffers from the repetitiveness.
Thème 6/8 :
- -
- Pertinence 3/4
I think it's very in theme.
- -
- Originalité 3/4
I thought this composition was original in its writing style.
Composition 5 /20
Technique 4/6 :
- -
- Instrumentation 2/3
Nice timbres you got here, good job!
- -
- Progression 2/3
I thought the pieces were appended to each other, but the flow of fear was very interesting.
Émotion 4/6 :
- -
- Naturel 2,5/3
I don't know what to say, I felt bad feelings... but they were kinda interesting.
- -
- Cohérence 1,5/3
I can't say it has good coherence because they were appended too much.
Thème 6/8 :
- -
- Pertinence 3/4
Not really Cinderella, but you meant the two bad sisters! Okay, that is original and creative.
- -
- Originalité 3/4
Very, very original!
Composition 6 /20
Technique 5,5/6 :
- -
- Instrumentation 3/3
- -
- Progression 2,5/3
Émotion 5/6 :
- -
- Naturel 2,5/3
That was very natural sounding, really.
- -
- Cohérence 2,5/3
The piece stands perfectly as a whole.
Thème 5/8 :
- -
- Pertinence 2/4
Hmm, it's a bit too jazzy to my tastes.
- -
- Originalité 3/4
There is a waltz like figure in, so I can imagine the dancing in a way.
Composition 7 /20
Technique 2,5/6 :
- -
- Instrumentation 1,5/3
I like pianos, but I don't think an orchestra would like to play this piece.
- -
- Progression 1/3
Bad progression, it doesn't flow good enough. Try to connect the different parts a bit better next time. Melody has to say something, which it doesn't.
Émotion 3/6 :
- -
- Naturel 1,5/3
I felt nothing good about this. Almost music from Shostakovitsj.
- -
- Cohérence 1,5/3
I already said the coherence is not good in this piece.
Thème 3/8 :
- -
- Pertinence 1,5/4
Theme wise it doesn't click with me.
- -
- Originalité 1,5/4
Hmmm, I almost sound like Lzn...
Composition 8 /20
Technique 5/6 :
- -
- Instrumentation 2,5/3
This sounds like a Franck/Alex song. Very broad timbre of instrumentation. Couldn't be better.
- -
- Progression 2,5/3
I felt this piece was really going somewhere! A minus point for the sudden stop there.
Émotion 3,5/6 :
- -
- Naturel 2/3
I didn't feel emoted really. The melody wasn't apparent enough for me.
- -
- Cohérence 1,5/3
I thought the song was divided in two parts, I wouldn't do that. The ending is very, very abrupt.
Thème 6/8 :
- -
- Pertinence 3/4
Right instrumentation.
- -
- Originalité 3/4
Original in a certain extent, but it sounds too classic to be really creative.
Composition 9 /20
Technique 5/6 :
- -
- Instrumentation 2,5/3
The orchestra sounds very promising and full.
It's good to use woodwinds, brass, strings and all of that. I would only recommend not to use to many unisono's in the strings. Try using a bit of bass strings too. Especially in the ending!!!
- -
- Progression 2,5/3
I really didn't like the progression, the harmonics are not creative enough.
HAHAHAHAAA I HEARD EDWARD GRIEG piano concerto! Plus 1 point.
If you look at the harmony, you almost always use V-I-V-I. And you keep doing that. There are pretty modulations like at 0:55. That's good, don't overly use I-V. A standard progression using I-IV-V-VI-IV-II-V-I is much, much more variated and interesting.
A note: don't overly stay on the tonica too much. The beginning of the song just keeps being on tonica while the melody is changing a lot, but the chords don't. That doesn't spice up your piece, that's where the boring part begins!
Your rhythm!!! Not good, you use half notes on every measure, you should variate the rhythm more. It now sounds like you are doing a contrapoint thesis where you would use half notes to write the entire structure of the piece. Try to be more original in rhythm.
This bad rhythm + bad progression of chords has a negative synergy.
Émotion 2,5/6 :
- -
- Naturel 1/3
Not emoted.
If you look at your melody. All the notes you used here in the melody are part of the chords you used. Try using other notes, more exotic notes that don't belong to these chords. The half notes in the melody aren't helping. It goes better in the Grieg part, there your melody starts doing something more interesting.
Now I especially point out on the ending. That's a standard progression.
- -
- Cohérence 1,5/3
Coherence is not good, no melody line apparent, very bad ending. I mean the ending is so generalistic and too theoretic.
Listen to 1:24. You tried to do a sequencing with this motive, which is a good thing. But! It is used in a wrong way! I'll explain.
You used I-II and then I-II. You should at least use a modulation when you do a motive sequence. And I-II is a bad progression.
The right way would be at least: I-II and then V-I. Or something more exotic.
Thème 6/8 :
- -
- Pertinence 3/4
I can see some Cinderella in it...
- -
- Originalité 3/4
Edward Grieg!
Composition 10 /20
Technique 4,5/6 :
- -
- Instrumentation 1,5/3
Cute instruments, but oh hell, that glockenspiel is much too hard...
minus point.
- -
- Progression 3/3
Nice harmonic flow and all because of the good use of instruments.
Émotion 5/6 :
- -
- Naturel 2,5/3
Cute, cute, cute!
- -
- Cohérence 2,5/3
Made me feel something very melancholic!
Thème 6,5/8 :
- -
- Pertinence 3,5/4
A nice view on Cinderella
- -
- Originalité 3/4
Very original.
Composition 11 /20
You're STELLAR, STELLAR, STELLAR.
Technique 4/6 :
- -
- Instrumentation 2,5/3
As always very interesting.
- -
- Progression 1,5/3
It felt as a whole. But toooo short.
Émotion 4/6 :
- -
- Naturel 2/3
Funny piece.
- -
- Cohérence 2/3
Too short.
Thème 6/8 :
- -
- Pertinence 3/4
I think very good in theme.
- -
- Originalité 3/4
Your style is original on itself.
Composition 12 /20
Technique 4,5/6 :
- -
- Instrumentation 2,5/3
Right instrumentation. Professional use of Harp. - -
- Progression 2/3
I felt at places a little passage that cut the piece in different pieces. Maybe it's because you don't change tonality enough...
UPDATE!!!
This is not music, this is a cinematic song!!! And you did well on that for the progression of the movie here.
Émotion 3,5/6 :
- -
- Naturel 2/3
Some flutes were too long and too hard. There are good things too, the harp sounded very natural, good glockenspiel.
- -
- Cohérence 1,5/3
I don't think you scored high on coherence with this piece. Musically speaking. + 0,5 for the ending.
Thème 5/8 :
- -
- Pertinence 2/4
Right instrumentation doesn't give you the power enough to make it sound like Cinderella.
- -
- Originalité 3/4
Hmm, very original, especially the ending. Pretty funny ending.